POK Assembly has replaced its parliamentary leader through no confidence motion last Tuesday. Sardar Attique Khan got only 15 votes after splitting his ruling Muslim conference and his opponent Sardar Yakub Khan got 31 votes out of 46 members Assembly. MC has 32 MLAs, PPP has 7 MLAs, Peoples Muslim league 4, MQM 2 and one is Independent. Sardar Attique has corruption charges, majority of his MC members turned against him because he was involved in corruption, mismanagement, nepotism, but some analysts think that corruption charges are true but not the only reason to remove him from power. His corruption charges are not new nor he is the only one who is involved to use this kind of position to get benefits. In POK area corruption is not prohibited at all nor it has been considered crime for these parasite class, as long as they are followers of their masters in Islamabad, most of their masters love to involve in corruption. Sardar Attique and his father Qayyum Khan have changed their stance on Kashmir long time ago but they exposed themselves during Musharraf time, when first time in 60 years of Pakistan,s history Govt has officially indicated that itt would be possibly for them to give up its past stand on Kashmir and out of box solution could be accepted. Sardar Qayyum and Sardar Attique quickly adopted the line and started advocating that it is possible to accept LOC as a line of commerce, Kashmir could be divided in to different regions, even it can be divided on communal basis. Sardar qayyum had gone to India to attend Kashmir conferences and even it is also known that Bhim singh organized conference in Delhi with help of Qayyum khan and POK Govt was also involved. Sardar Qayyum and Sardar Attique have been constantly making statements against APHC agenda and they do not consider Hurriyat represents entire state of Jammu kashmir. It is very true that some of MC leaders from POK also surprised when both father and Son had changed their stance on traditional MC line to Musharraf,s 4 point formula. They did try to sell it in POK but some how failed to deliver it in to their own party, only few individuals from POK who already having contacts with Indian intelligence supported this idea but not publicly. Sardar Qayyum and Sardar Attique started supporting composite dialog between India and Pakistan and peaceful resolution on Kashmir dispute. Musharraf formula was supported by one small section of Military and civilian establishment and opposed by ISI and pro Jihadi faction of Pakistani military officers and they still do. In fact Sardar Attique was choice of Gen Musharraf but disliked by ISI because of their changed stance on Kashmir. ISI did not like Musharraf formula at all because of its long involvement in Kashmiri Jihadi struggle and strong control on Kashmiri Jihadi groups in valley. ISI knew it very well that weakening these Jihadi groups means that strengthening directly pro independence and pro Indian forces. Sardar Qayyum and Farooq Abdullah group also made some level of understanding and it was the main reason which led no trust motion against Sardar Attique. It is not any way good step forward for POK people to get removed their PM by those forces which are not ready to restore our basic democratic rights in POK and POGB. POK people elect their Govt and person elected from Gujarat has contributed to replaced our PM, it is completely unacceptable involvement and unfortunately, it has been chosen by our own so called POK leaders. These leaders have been supporting ISI involvement in POK politics and today they are the victim of this kind of self promoted politics of Pakistani intelligence agencies. Removal of POK PM is a democratic process no body is opposing it any way but it is a work of unseen forces and unwanted elements in POK. Regards. Javed Inayat. |